Choosing between Mia and traditional breast augmentation is ultimately about your goals, your anatomy, and your lifestyle. In Turkey—especially Istanbul—both options are performed at a very high level. Mia is a minimal scar breast augmentation strategy designed for subtle, natural-looking enhancement via small incision breast implants, often placed through the underarm (transaxillary) access and, where appropriate, with local anesthesia breast surgery workflows. Traditional augmentation covers a wider spectrum of volumes, incision locations, and combined procedures (like lifts).
This guide breaks down the key differences so you can confidently decide. If you want expert, case-specific advice while you read, message a coordinator:
Chat now on WhatsApp
Philosophy: Harmonization vs. Maximization
Incisions & Scarring
Anesthesia & OR Time
Have a specific preference or medical consideration?
📲 Ask a coordinator on WhatsApp
Consider Mia If You Want:
Consider Traditional If You Want:
Not sure where you land? Send a brief description (age, weight/height, photos if you wish) for a quick triage:
WhatsApp → Get a tailored suggestion
Transaxillary (Underarm) — Often Used in Mia
Inframammary (Breast Fold) — Common in Traditional
Periareolar — Select Traditional Indications
Bottom line: The best incision is the one that matches your anatomy and goals. A surgeon deeply experienced in all three can guide you to the safest, most aesthetic option.
Pocket Options
How Mia Approaches Pocket Control
Mia workflows emphasize precise pocket geometry and low-friction delivery of small incision breast implants to support symmetry and stable fold position. This control is central to achieving a “you—but better” outcome.
Early Recovery (Days 1–7)
Week 2 & Beyond
Golden rule: Your surgeon’s instructions override generic timelines. Healing is individual.
Shared Risks
All implants involve general surgical risks (bleeding, infection) and implant considerations (malposition, capsular contracture). Early reporting of red flags protects outcomes.
Mia-Specific Notes
Traditional-Specific Notes
Istanbul vs Other Cities
What Drives the Quote
Want a transparent, itemized estimate?
💬 Get your quote on WhatsApp
“I’m a Runner/Gym-Goer; I Want Subtle, Natural”
Likely Mia. Harmonization and pocket planning keep movement comfortable and shape authentic. Underarm scar is discreet.
“I Want Noticeably Bigger and Rounder”
Likely Traditional. A broader size range and fold access make high-projection, dramatic plans smoother to execute.
“I Have Significant Sagging After Breastfeeding”
Likely Traditional + Lift. Mastopexy incisions differ; a lift aligns nipple position and lower-pole geometry with your goals.
“I Had an Implant Before; Things Shifted”
Likely Traditional (Revision). Direct visualization helps correct capsule or fold issues; approach depends on findings.
Dual Mastery: Mia & Traditional
Your decision is easier with a surgeon who excels at both. Dr. Yakup Işık is widely recognized in Turkey for Mia (underarm, minimal-scar logic) and for comprehensive traditional augmentation, including complex revisions and lifts.
A Patient-Education–First Process
From sizing logic (base width, projection profiles) to recovery maps, his team keeps the journey transparent and calm—no guesswork, no rushed steps.
Results That Age Gracefully
Consistent, natural-looking outcomes that hold up in motion, gym wear, and swimwear—today and years from now. That’s why many patients specifically seek him out for Mia vs breast implants decisions.
Want direct advice from Dr. Işık’s coordination team?
WhatsApp—start your assessment
Clarify Your Priorities
Validate the Plan
Still 50/50? A short clinical note from the team can tip the scales:
📲 Send details on WhatsApp → get a recommendation
1) Is Mia always better because the scar isn’t on the breast?
Not always. If you need a large volume change, a lift, or a complex revision, a breast-based incision may be smarter. The “best” is the one aligned with your goals and anatomy.
2) Can Mia be done with local anesthesia?
In selected candidates, yes—local anesthesia breast surgery with sedation is possible. Safety and comfort drive the choice.
3) Is recovery faster with Mia?
Many perceive a smoother first week, but healing varies. Compliance and pocket/implant choices matter greatly in both methods.
4) Are results with Mia long-lasting?
Yes—when sizing, pocket plane, and aftercare are correct. As with any implant, long-term follow-up matters.
5) What if I want subtle now but might want more later?
Discuss a staged plan. Sometimes Mia now and a future adjustment later is reasonable—your surgeon can map it out.
6) Is traditional augmentation always obvious or “fake-looking”?
No. A skilled surgeon can craft natural outcomes with traditional methods too—choice of size/profile and pocket plane is key.
7) What about breastfeeding after either method?
Incision placement and plane impact this, but no guarantees exist. Discuss family plans in consultation.
8) Which is more expensive in Turkey: Mia or traditional?
It depends. Mia may carry a technique premium; traditional with lifts/revisions can also increase costs. Compare like-for-like inclusions.
If you want discretion (no scar on the breast), subtle volume, and a streamlined return to life, Mia may be the perfect match. If you want larger changes, need a lift, or face revision complexity, traditional augmentation likely serves you better. The winning strategy is choosing a surgeon who’s outstanding at both—so the plan is built around you, not around a single technique.
When you’re ready to turn research into a personalized plan, get quick, clear, friendly help:
Turkish
